{"id":211,"date":"2011-01-13T19:10:21","date_gmt":"2011-01-14T02:10:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ipmetrics.net\/blog\/?p=211"},"modified":"2011-01-13T19:10:21","modified_gmt":"2011-01-14T02:10:21","slug":"policing-intellectual-property-in-beta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.ipmetrics.net\/blog\/economics\/licensing\/policing-intellectual-property-in-beta\/","title":{"rendered":"Policing Intellectual Property in Beta"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the modern worlds of touch screens, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.swypeinc.com\" target=\"_blank\">Swype Inc.<\/a>&#8216;s innovative software \u00a0provides a faster and easier way to interact with virtual keyboards. \u00a0As the company describes its <a href=\"http:\/\/www.swypeinc.com\/product.html\" target=\"_blank\">product<\/a>, &#8220;&#8230; With one continuous finger or stylus motion across the screen keyboard, the patented technology enables users to input words faster and easier than other data input methods\u2014at over 40 words per minute. The application is designed to work across a variety of devices such as phones, tablets, game consoles, kiosks, televisions, virtual screens and more&#8230;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Up to now, the application has been made available as a Beta product and, consequently, it is an evolving project. \u00a0It is attractive enough, however, that a significant portion of the Android development community has created modifications and alternative &#8220;skins&#8221; for various Android cell phones and tablets.<\/p>\n<p>Trying to balance the protection of their intellectual property and encouraging the developer fan base, the company has come out with a statement they hope will set the ground rules. \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/phandroid.com\/2011\/01\/13\/swype-inc-clears-up-stance-on-distribution-of-their-keyboard-app\/\" target=\"_blank\">Phandroid reported today<\/a> about Swype&#8217;s posting of these rules.<\/p>\n<p>Swype was initially available only to those who \u00a0managed to &#8220;luck into&#8221; a fairly restricted beta. \u00a0Since last month, it is open, at least for the moment, to anyone who <a href=\"http:\/\/beta.swype.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">registers<\/a> and happens to have a compatible phone,\u00a0as <a href=\"http:\/\/lifehacker.com\/5715565\/swype-gesture+based-android-beta-now-available-to-all\" target=\"_blank\">Lifehacker reports<\/a>. \u00a0While the release of software products at the Beta stage is fairly common, typically this is seen as restricted market testing or, more often, among Open Source products. \u00a0What is more unique in this situation is the release of a Beta for a Patent-protected technology, in what amounts to a royalty-free, time-limited license. \u00a0Hardware manufacturers, on the other hand, must follow different (more traditional) licensing models to include the software in their products.<\/p>\n<p>This is a noteworthy experiment in adapting patent licensing business models to the age of non-scarcity pricing and open-source collaboration, and it is a promising and welcome development in the software industry. \u00a0It&#8217;s a nifty application to boot!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the modern worlds of touch screens, Swype Inc.&#8217;s innovative software  provides a faster and easier way to interact with virtual keyboards. Trying to balance the protection of their intellectual property and encouraging the developer fan base, the company has come out with a statement they hope will set the ground rules.  Phandroid reported today about Swype&#8217;s posting of these rules.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,16,17],"tags":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2xROl-3p","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ipmetrics.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ipmetrics.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ipmetrics.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ipmetrics.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ipmetrics.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.ipmetrics.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ipmetrics.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ipmetrics.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ipmetrics.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}