Archive for the ‘Licensing’ Category

Leveraging IP via the Capital Markets

Tuesday, January 18th, 2011

By: David Drews, CLP

Relatively few organizations appreciate the full scope of flexibility available to them in terms of unlocking the value of their patents, trademarks and other intellectual property.  One of the most overlooked methods for utilizing the value of IP is its use as collateral. This activity is becoming more common as the importance of proper intellectual property management gains recognition and as increased cash flows associated with the licensing of IP catches the eye of Wall Street.  The highest profile examples of these transactions are probably the securitized royalty streams on the copyrights owned by famous songwriters like David Bowie and James Brown.  However, there have been numerous instances of valuable trademarks and highly productive patents being utilized in this capacity as well.

There are a number of reasons why an IP owner might be interested in pursuing this kind of strategy.  First, it can provide a method for transferring some of the risk associated with the intellectual property.  If the financing is non-recourse, the risk of receiving the royalty payments is transferred to the lender.  Also, any risks associated with infringement and obsolescence are transferred as well.  Second, it may increase the return on the IP through increased leverage.  This is because the present value of impending royalty streams is being collected in a lump sum today rather than spread out over the future.  This lump sum payment can then be invested in current projects that feature an internal rate of return that is higher than the cost of the financing.  Any upside potential residing in the IP is typically retained by the IP owner as well.

Third, it provides a source of capital that does not dilute the current equity structure.  With venture capital discounts typically in the range of 25% to 50%, this is very beneficial when compared to equity sources of financing, especially for smaller technology companies.  An additional benefit of this kind of financing is that the interest payments are tax deductible.  This helps to offset a portion of the discount taken as a result of the present value analysis.

To read more, download the full article.

Policing Intellectual Property in Beta

Thursday, January 13th, 2011

In the modern worlds of touch screens, Swype Inc.‘s innovative software  provides a faster and easier way to interact with virtual keyboards.  As the company describes its product, “… With one continuous finger or stylus motion across the screen keyboard, the patented technology enables users to input words faster and easier than other data input methods—at over 40 words per minute. The application is designed to work across a variety of devices such as phones, tablets, game consoles, kiosks, televisions, virtual screens and more…”

Up to now, the application has been made available as a Beta product and, consequently, it is an evolving project.  It is attractive enough, however, that a significant portion of the Android development community has created modifications and alternative “skins” for various Android cell phones and tablets.

Trying to balance the protection of their intellectual property and encouraging the developer fan base, the company has come out with a statement they hope will set the ground rules.  Phandroid reported today about Swype’s posting of these rules.

Swype was initially available only to those who  managed to “luck into” a fairly restricted beta.  Since last month, it is open, at least for the moment, to anyone who registers and happens to have a compatible phone, as Lifehacker reports.  While the release of software products at the Beta stage is fairly common, typically this is seen as restricted market testing or, more often, among Open Source products.  What is more unique in this situation is the release of a Beta for a Patent-protected technology, in what amounts to a royalty-free, time-limited license.  Hardware manufacturers, on the other hand, must follow different (more traditional) licensing models to include the software in their products.

This is a noteworthy experiment in adapting patent licensing business models to the age of non-scarcity pricing and open-source collaboration, and it is a promising and welcome development in the software industry.  It’s a nifty application to boot!