Peace, Love, and Trademark Infringement

December 27th, 2010

By: Fernando Torres, MSc

Last week,  The Popcorn Factory LLC, a 1-800-FLOWERS.COM company,  filed a federal lawsuit for trademark infringement and cybersquatting against “Love Peace Popcorn” a Frisco, Texas family store.  The store, run by the Paparella family, has a federal registration for the mark (#77,558,903) based on a first use in commerce since August 2008, and uses illustrations of a heart, a peace sign, and a piece of popcorn:

rotate-logo

The Popcorn Factory has been marketing some of their products and related merchandise as PEACE, LOVE & POPCORN, but we could not find a federal registration at all and it is not claimed as a trademark on their website (no TM).

PLP-150x150

The complaint claims The Popcorn Factory began marketing products under the slogan “Peace Love Popcorn” and, curiously enough, illustrated by similar drawings of a peace sign, a heart and a piece of popcorn since the Spring of 2008.

On the face of it, this case will bring into question the rights of  a federal registration (defendant) versus the common law use (plaintiff).  The claim for cyber-squatting seems weak because the plaintiff does not have a registration.  If neither party was aware of the other’s usage, as claimed, then actual damages may be hard to prove and the statutory route under cyber-squatting may be the only monetary award available.  Of course, a damages assessment is necessary these days to support an injunction.

This is an intriguing case we shall follow with interest.  Thanks go to the timeliness of the Chicago Breaking Business site for bringing this case to our attention.

The trouble with presumed validity – Exhibit B

December 23rd, 2010

Another absurd case of patents that would not have been issued, but for the deadly combination of the presumption of validity, the absence of commons sense, and a shallow search for prior art is the recent patent on podcasting.

A company called Volomedia just got the Patent Office to grant them such a monopoly.  The Volomedia patent covers “a method for providing episodic media.” In this day and age, it is a ridiculously broad patent, covering something that a wide variety of people have been doing for many years. Worse, the EFF warns, “…it could create a whole new layer of ongoing costs for podcasters and their listeners. Right now, just about anyone can create their own on-demand talk radio program, earning an audience on the strength of their ideas. But more costs and hassle means that podcasting could go the way of mainstream radio — with only the big guys able to afford an audience…”

EFF and the law firm of Howrey, LLP aren’t willing to just sit by and watch: “…This patent could threaten the vibrant community of podcasters and millions of podcast listeners…”  They want to put a stop to it, but they need your help.  Read more about this project at: EFF.