Archive for the ‘Litigation’ Category

Article of the Month – Georgia-Pacific Royalties in Trademark Cases – les Nouvelles

Friday, January 9th, 2015

The highly regarded les Nouvelles journal has designated the most recent article by David Drews, IPmetrics’ founder and president, as the article of the month for January 2015.

The article, Determining An Appropriate Royalty Rate For Reasonable Royalty Trademark Damages A Modified Georgia-Pacific Framework, discusses the concepts and nuances of the application of the well-established analytical framework for determining reasonable royalties in the context of patent infringement to the determination of similarly reasonable royalties to compensate trademarks owners in infringement cases.  Since its publication in the print edition of the journal, the article has been the subject of keen interest on the part of practitioners and litigators in trademark law.

les Nouvelles, the journal of the Licensing Executives Society International (LESI), is published quarterly and is designed to further the knowledge of the societies members and others in improving their skills, techniques and knowledge in licensing and protecting Intellectual Property (more information here).

Facebook Sponsored Stories Settlement

Tuesday, May 6th, 2014

IP Expert Witness icon

If, like so many millions of people in the US, you or your child have or have had a Facebook account and a Facebook Sponsored Story featured your or your child’s name or profile picture, you or your child may be a “Class Member” in a class action lawsuit which recently settled. IPmetrics’ Chief Economist was Plaintiffs’ expert testifying with regards to the rights of publicity damages.

As you may, or may not, know, Facebook’s “Sponsored Stories” are a form of paid advertising that typically re-posts members’ likes and updates connecting members’ profile image and name with an advertiser’s message to promote to the member’s network of “Facebook friends.”  Facebook and its advertisers do this with the understanding that these advertisements have a better chance that the posts will be seen and clicked-on by targeted users. While Facebook and the advertisers likely benefit from the incremental impact of the ads, the use if members’  images and names would violate statutes that require consent from the member. In intellectual property terms, Facebook is allegedly infringing some of its members’ rights of publicity under California law.

The case has not been heard by the federal courts and liability has not been determined but, while Facebook denies any wrongdoing and any liability whatsoever, a settlement has been reached with the plaintiffs.

The Court issued its Order Granting Motion for Final Approval of Settlement Agreement on August 26, 2013, and the Final Judgment on September 19, 2013. However, appeals have been filed. Before any settlement payments can be made, all appeals filed must be resolved. If you are interested in learning more about the settlement and your rights, you should consult the settlement website.